Osmos
Articles

Osmos Global Publication · Osmos Perspective

Food Is Infrastructure in the Indian Workplace

A daily service can materially affect whether attendance feels workable.

Osmos Global Research & Knowledge Centre3 min readSign in to download

Evidence context

JLL’s India analysis reports that one in two respondents identified quality food services as the most important factor for improving their day at work. This sits alongside high workplace satisfaction and continuing demand for wellness, collaborative and social features.

Food is sometimes classified as an optional amenity. In long workdays, large campuses or locations with limited external choice, it functions more like operational infrastructure: it affects time, convenience, inclusion, social connection and perceived care.

Osmos Global analysis

The right response is not automatically a premium cafeteria. Leaders should examine workforce schedules, dietary needs, price, queueing, safety, shift coverage and local market access. A modest reliable service may create more value than a visually impressive but inaccessible offer.

Food data should include uptake, wait time, affordability, waste, satisfaction and coverage. These measures allow service quality, employee value and sustainability to be managed together.

What this changes for decision-making The practical significance of “Food Is Infrastructure in the Indian Workplace” is that workplace decisions must be framed as testable operating choices rather than expressions of preference. Leaders should identify the affected workforce, the work moment being improved, the constraint being removed and the evidence that would justify further investment. This prevents a global survey average from becoming a local design instruction and makes the decision transparent to finance, employees and operational teams.

The decision record should also include trade-offs. More collaboration space may reduce focus capacity; higher service coverage may increase operating cost; stronger attendance coordination may reduce individual flexibility; and greater data precision may create privacy concerns. A credible workplace strategy does not hide these tensions. It states which outcome has priority, which safeguards apply and when the choice will be reconsidered.

Leadership implications

Workplace, FM, CRE, HR and technology leaders should treat this issue as a connected operating decision. The objective is not to maximise attendance, satisfaction or space efficiency independently; it is to create an environment that supports defined work while using capital and services responsibly. Business leaders remain responsible for specifying the outcomes that workplace investment is expected to enable.

Implementation guidance

Begin with one workforce segment, location or recurring moment where the present experience can be reconstructed. Record employee perception, actual demand, environmental or service conditions and the business purpose of the setting. Design a bounded intervention, establish the expected evidence before launch, and compare the result across peak and normal periods. Scale only when the improvement is repeatable and material.

What the evidence does not prove

The cited research does not demonstrate that the proposed action will increase individual productivity, prevent resignation or produce a specific financial return. Survey respondents describe experiences, preferences and intentions; portfolio benchmarks describe participating assets and clients. Osmos Global uses those findings to structure a decision, not to promise an outcome. Any external website statement should retain this distinction and avoid converting correlation, sentiment or benchmark position into causation.

Practical actions

• Segment food needs by schedule and location. • Track affordability and queue time, not only satisfaction. • Design for dietary and accessibility requirements. • Connect demand planning with waste reduction.

Risks, limitations and unresolved questions The finding comes from a 626-person India subset in large organisations. It should guide local investigation rather than justify a universal food-service investment.

Source notes

[1] JLL India. Beyond Mandates: The Future of Work in India. 30 October 2025. https://www.jll.com/en-in/insights/beyond-mandates-the-future-of-work-in-india [2] Gensler Research Institute. Global Workplace Survey 2025. 23 April 2025. https://www.gensler.com/gri/global-workplace-survey-2025

Cite this

Osmos Global Research & Knowledge Centre (2026). Food Is Infrastructure in the Indian Workplace. Osmos Perspective, Osmos Global. https://www.osmosglobal.org/articles/food-is-infrastructure-in-the-indian-workplace

Keep reading

Download this paper

The full PDF, formatted for circulation. Downloads are for members, so that we know who our research reaches.

Discussion

Add what you are seeing on the ground.

Members can add their input here.

Comments appear under your own name and company.

Join Osmos